Super Visa QuoteManulife vs GMS Super Visa Insurance
Compare Manulife and GMS Super Visa insurance for parents and grandparents — a large national insurer versus a not-for-profit insurer — on pre-existing rules, age limits, and provincial availability.
- A large for-profit insurer versus a not-for-profit insurer
- Manulife runs to age 85; GMS is for applicants under 80
- Both use a 180-day pre-existing window, but apply it differently
- GMS is not available in Quebec, New Brunswick, or Nunavut
Manulife vs GMS Super Visa Insurance
Manulife and GMS are a useful contrast: Manulife is one of Canada's largest insurers, while GMS Insurance Inc. (Group Medical Services) is a not-for-profit insurer. For families weighing a recognizable national brand against a not-for-profit option, the practical differences come down to age eligibility, how each applies its pre-existing rule, and where GMS is available.
Manulife's Visitors to Canada plans are offered in two tiers (Standard and Enhanced) up to $200,000, from age 30 days to 85 years. GMS offers a single Visitors to Canada plan from $100,000, generally for applicants under age 80 on the effective date.
Both plans must meet the same IRCC baseline
Both providers are reviewed against the same IRCC Super Visa insurance requirement: coverage valid for at least one year from the date of entry, at least $100,000 in emergency medical coverage, and proof of a paid or instalment policy. Confirm the current minimum with your advisor, as requirements can change.
Manulife vs GMS comparison table
| Feature | Manulife | GMS |
|---|---|---|
| Insurer | The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (for-profit) | GMS Insurance Inc. / Group Medical Services (not-for-profit) |
| Plan structure | Standard and Enhanced tiers | Single Visitors to Canada plan |
| Coverage amount | Up to $200,000 | $100,000 and up |
| Eligibility age | 30 days to 85 years | Under 80 on the effective date (ages 70+ may need to confirm independence with daily activities) |
| Pre-existing approach | Standard: flat 180-day exclusion, no stability test. Enhanced may cover stable conditions | 180-day stability window assessed with an 8-part stability test |
| Provincial availability | Confirm with your advisor | Not available in Quebec, New Brunswick, or Nunavut |
| Notification rule | Confirm with your advisor | Notify within 24 hours of emergency/hospitalization — late notice can reduce eligible expenses significantly |
| Waiting period | 72 hours (within 30 days of arrival) or 7 days | 0, 2, or 7 days depending on purchase timing |
| Best for | Families wanting a large brand and coverage up to $200,000 | Families wanting a not-for-profit insurer with straightforward $100,000+ coverage |
Figures reflect each provider's reviewed policy wording (Manulife Standard Plan effective October 2023). Confirm current terms with your advisor before purchasing.
Compare Manulife and GMS Super Visa insurance quotes
Share the visitor age, province of stay, travel dates, and medical history. We can help compare a large national insurer against a not-for-profit option side by side.
The key difference: flat exclusion vs. stability test
Both providers reference a 180-day period for pre-existing conditions, but they apply it differently. On Manulife's Standard Plan, the 180 days is a flat exclusion with no stability test — any condition treated, medicated, or symptomatic in the 180 days before the effective date is excluded, regardless of how stable it has been (Manulife's Enhanced tier may instead offer stable-condition coverage).
GMS uses the 180 days as a stability window: a condition that meets its 8-part stability test across that window may be eligible. In other words, with GMS the question is whether the condition has been stable for 180 days, while with Manulife's Standard Plan the question is simply whether it was touched at all in the last 180 days. For a parent with a stable but ongoing condition, that distinction can be decisive.
See our Pre-Existing Conditions Guide for what 'stable' means, and ask our advisor to compare both against your parent's history.
Real-life scenarios
Parent age 62, no medical conditions
Both fit. Manulife's Standard Plan and GMS's single plan can both work; compare coverage amount (Manulife to $200,000 vs. GMS $100,000+), price, deductible, and refund terms.
Grandparent age 73, stable diabetes
GMS's 180-day stability window may allow coverage if the diabetes meets its 8-part test. On Manulife's Standard Plan the condition would be excluded under the flat 180-day rule, so the family would need to look at Manulife's Enhanced tier. Compare GMS against Manulife Enhanced here.
Applicant age 82
GMS is generally for applicants under 80, so an 82-year-old would typically fall outside GMS eligibility — Manulife (to age 85) becomes the practical comparison. Confirm eligibility with your advisor.
Family living in Quebec, New Brunswick, or Nunavut
GMS Visitors to Canada insurance is not available in these provinces and territory, so Manulife (or another available provider) would be the practical comparison. Confirm availability before requesting quotes.
Pros and cautions to review
- Manulife: large national brand, two-tier structure, coverage up to $200,000, ages to 85 — but the Standard Plan's flat 180-day exclusion has no stability test, so check Enhanced if medical history is a factor.
- GMS: not-for-profit insurer, straightforward $100,000+ coverage, a 180-day stability window that can cover stable conditions — but eligibility stops under age 80, it is unavailable in Quebec/New Brunswick/Nunavut, and its 24-hour notification rule carries a significant penalty if missed.
Final verdict
Manulife may suit families who want a large brand, higher coverage, or coverage for an applicant closer to 85. GMS may suit families who value a not-for-profit insurer and whose parent (under 80, in an available province) has a stable condition that fits the 180-day stability test.
For most families, the best approach is to request both quotes with one identical applicant profile and compare how each handles the parent's age, province, and medical history.
Manulife vs GMS FAQs
Is GMS a not-for-profit insurer?
Yes. GMS Insurance Inc. (Group Medical Services) is a not-for-profit insurer. Manulife (The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company) is a large for-profit insurer. Both can be structured to meet Super Visa requirements.
Which covers pre-existing conditions better, Manulife or GMS?
It depends on the condition. GMS uses a 180-day stability window with an 8-part test, so a stable condition may be eligible. Manulife's Standard Plan uses a flat 180-day exclusion with no stability test; its Enhanced tier may instead cover stable conditions. Compare GMS against Manulife Enhanced when medical history is involved.
What is the age limit for each?
Manulife's Visitors to Canada plans run from age 30 days to 85 years. GMS is generally available for applicants under age 80 on the effective date, and applicants 70 and older may need to confirm independence with daily activities.
Is GMS available in every province?
No. GMS Visitors to Canada insurance is not available in Quebec, New Brunswick, or Nunavut. Confirm current availability with your advisor.
Which is cheaper, Manulife or GMS?
The cheaper option depends on age, coverage amount, province, and medical history. Compare both using the same applicant inputs rather than assuming a not-for-profit insurer is automatically cheaper.
Continue comparing Super Visa insurance options
Related Insights and Guides
Compare Manulife and GMS Super Visa insurance quotes
Share the visitor age, province of stay, travel dates, and medical history. We can help compare a large national insurer against a not-for-profit option side by side.